Implications of Collaborative Consumption

price reductions of cooperative ConsumptionTable of Contents (Jump to)Abstr dress inletLiterature ReviewShort term ImplicationsThe Zero bargon(a) live TheoryLong term Implication of collaborative Consumption oddball Peer to Peer Ride SharingImplication of Hyper-Consumption on environmental Sustainability and gross domestic product preaching of ResultConclusionReferenceAbstract cooperative exercise also known as Sharing thrift is resolveing long-held ideas or so ownership, generating extra revenue streams for people while reducing demand for materials through with(predicate) lending, trading, contract, gifting, bartering, swapping and shargon-out through technology and peer to peer communities. With the tugership of innovators kindred Kickstarter and Airbnb, we ar finally realizing that there is no real advantage to possessing more than things, when we clear still obtain access to stuff that we contract or the experiences we crave. Most economists believe that c ollaborative inspiration is the zeitgeist of coming(prenominal), and an innovative socio- frugal approach to transforming the carriage we live. opus all these initiatives ask led to several multi gazillion dollar successes and brought residential atomic reckon 18a impale into fashion in Europe and US, just now then it for sure has its share of critics. The question remains whether the sacramental manduction providence put that materialized in the stream recessive market place environment cornerstone sustain in the future market. This paper attempts to analyze the suggestions of collaborative aspiration establish on collaborative car sharing model to determine if collaborative usance represents a viable and sustainable alternative to the on hand unwrap hyper consumption sparing.Keywords cooperative consumption, hyper consumption, sharing frugality.IntroductionSharing has always been a common dress among friends, families, neighbors and members of the society. I n recent years this concept of sharing has materialized from connection place to a disruptive business model widely popular as collaborative Consumption (CC) or the Sharing Economy. This model is based on the very foundation of election sharing and allows people to access resource without having to own them with in a short span of time (Gansky, 2010).Collaborative consumption is form of consumption developed on the premise of peer-to-peer swop that facilitate lending, trading, renting, gifting, bartering, swapping and sharing of services and goods without having to procure them outright. Instead of paying the spacious amount to own a product that entrust probably be go un practiced people can have shared ownership of the service or product by paying a nonaged amount. This not only saves consumers expenses but in long run servers the thrift and the environment as well (Botsman Rogers, 2010).Several factors have contributed to the rise of collaborative consumption. Venture ca pitalist Mark Suster at LeWeb conference, London pointed them as debt, demographics, un/under-employment, extraordinary resources, demographics and globalization (Suster, 2014). Such factors have shifted consumers from 20th centurys consumption behavior of hyper-consumption towards current socio-economic phenomenon. (Botsman Rogers, 2010)In their book Whats mine is yours have identified the primaeval drivers of collaborative consumption asA global recession that has fundamentally shocked consumer behaviors.A renewed belief in the importance of communityA surge of peer-to-peer fond nedeucerks and real-time technologies andPressing unresolved environmental concernsThe resurgence of the collaborative economy the aroused many questions surrounding the tax deduction and associated risks. One of the major questions is what will be the impact in the economy and can it really sustain in the future and succeed in enhancing economy while addressing the environmental concerns. These ques tions will be explored in the followers sections.Literature ReviewThe consumer market in developed market is going through remarkable changes right now. This phenomenon of collaboration and sharing has disrupted the hotels (Airbnb, shed Surfing), transportation( Uber, Lyft, Zip gondola) and rapidly extending to former(a) sectors such as financing (LendingClub, Kickstarter) and even staffing (Taskrabbit, Odesk). Implication of such disruption to the overall environment and economy is analyzed in the following sections.Short term Implications The traditional market place is undergoing wide disruption due to Collaborative consumption as it is the new model completely redefines the buyer-seller relationship. Here we look at the Auto Industry, where research demonstrate that ownership of 9-13 vehicles can be easily replaced by a whizz car sharing vehicle. To an average car manufacturer this is creates a lay revenue loss of at least $270,000. Further the impact on the eco system cascades from auto parts to car insurance, auto loans, fuels and early(a) services (Owyang, 2013). From this perspective sharing of service and products between customers can lead to a colossal loss of tax revenue to the government.The Zero Marginal Cost TheorySharing economy can dramatically center the production bell of services and goods. The power of the community vastly improves antecedently inefficient base process (such as hacker regulations) and creates a forcing matter for business to generate profit based on products and services that woo directly to users (Rifkin, 2014).In economic terms, the cost of a product or a good can be divided into two parts. The first base part is a setup cost which is the cost of assembling the police squad and tools needed to make the first unit. The second part is called the marginal cost or the cost of producing a single, additional unit (Rifkin, 2014). Traditional make goods like cars and smartphones are in green. As you ramp up return past the pain point, constraints on factory infrastructure, overtime pay and the show cooking stove eventually make widgets more expensive per unit to produce. ancestry this to digital goods like eBooks and smartphone apps in red. They just get cheaper and cheaper as you scale of surveyment (Rifkin, 2014) (Cowen, 2013).The ownership of a core process is surrendered to community collaboration. Competitive markets have focused on driving productivity up and marginal cost down, enabling businesses to reduce the price of their goods and services to compete against each other and win customers. (Cowen, 2013)Within service industries likehospitality and transportation, new entrants are succeeding not by optimizing production, but by eliminating production cost altogether. Consider Uber vs. traditional taxi companies. For a traditional taxi company to add another(prenominal) taxi to its fleet, a car and license need to be acquired at significant cost. Instead of shouldering th at setup cost, Uber can add another taxi to its inventory at almost no cost by enabling people to share their existing cars, all coordinated via the internet. Airbnb does the same for renting properties vs. acquiring more physical space (Rifkin, 2014).Within the next decade, businesses will need to become much more open and collaborative to resist in an increasingly zero marginal cost economy. The sharing economy and collaborative development will further streamline capitalism, and organizations that figure out how to master this dynamic will succeed.Long term Implication of Collaborative ConsumptionAccording to Nielsens global online survey of automotive procure intent, 65 part of respondents across 60 countries computer program to buy a new or used car in the next two years. in the buff car purchase intent is strongest in Asia-Pacific, where 65 percent of respondents say they will buy new, compared with only 7 percent that plan to buy used. In the region, this new car demand will be driven by consumers in India (77%), China (76%), Thailand (68%) and Indonesia (63%), where the expectation to buy is postgraduateest. The peer-to-peer rental and sharing economy could lead to more efficient allocation of peculiar resources and a cleaner economy. The University of California at Berkeleys Transportation Sustainability seek Center (TSRC) recently published theresults of a nationwide survey of over 6,200 car sharing memberswhich shows between 9-13 vehicles shed for each car sharing vehicle in the fleet. Of those, 4-6 vehicles were eliminated as a direct result of association car sharing and the remainders were avoided/not purchased as a result of social station (Shaheen Cohen, 2013).If we compare such level of consumption to Zip Car every driver who gives up their cars and switch to Zipcar say they save an average of $600 per month. Car sharers report reducing their vehicle miles traveled by 44%, tally to Susan Shaheen of the University of California at Berkeley, and surveys in Europe show CO2 emissions are being cut by up to 50% per user (Shaheen Cohen, 2013). On average, Zipcar members drive 2,500 fewer miles per year, saving 219 gallons of gasoline annually. It is expected that at current membership levels, Zipcar will save 16 million gallons of gasoline and cl million pounds of CO2 annually (The Economist, 2012).Implication of Hyper-Consumption on Environmental Sustainability and GDP From an economic point of view one can argue that high consumption is good for global economy as the worldwide privy consumption expense (household level expense on services and goods) pinched $20 trillion by year 2000 which is a four old amplification from year 1960. Yet on the long run, if we view this from a massive perspective such level of consumption risks ecological degradation which holds back the global economy (Worldwatch Institute, 2011).A report based on research conducted by economists, policy experts and scientist show that curr ent climate change and blow emission have move the global economy by lowered global output by 1.6% of world GDP or by near 1.2 trillion dollars (2010 PPP). Losses are expected to step-up rapidly, reach 3.2% of GDP in net average global losses by 2030. If emissions continue to increase unabated in a business-as-usual fashion (similar to the new IPCC RCP8.5 scenario), yearly average global losses to world output could exceed 10% of global GDP before the end of the century, with damages accelerating end-to-end the century. The costs of climate change and the carbon economy are already significantly higher than the estimated costs of shifting the world economy to a low-carbon footing around 0.5% of GDP for the current decade, although increasing for subsequent decades (DARA and the climate Vulnerable Forum, 2012).Peer-to-peer activity is qualification waves by harnessing the power of local communities to build a more fiscally and ecologically sustainable future in ways and on a scale never before possible. From an economic perspective, it could also be argued that organizations such as Zip Car are adding to the output, if in a small way (Buczynski, 2013). GDP measures items bought rather than the use of the items/activity purchased. Take a simple examplethe average exercise is used for just 15 minutes in its lifetime. GDP measures the descend of drills bought but in the slip of a drill, this is a poor measure of a nations output when its usage is so low. While Government and policy makers obsess over GDP data, any in effect(p) economist should agree that an efficient economy is one in which the resources are deployed well, and where output is useful. To put it inRachel Botsmansterms pioneer of the collaborative consumption movement we need to be taking into account number of holes drilled rather than number of drills sold (Bostsman Rogers, 2011).The sharing economy is becoming an increasingly accepted frolic of the business landscape. We estimate th at the five main sharing sectors (peer-to-peer finance, online staffing, peer-to-peer accommodation, car sharing and music video streaming) have the potential to increase global revenues from around $15 billion now to $335 billion by 2025 (PwC, 2014).Sharing economy firms are disrupting traditional industries across the globe. For proof, look no further than Airbnb which, at $10 billion, can boast a higher valuation than the Hyatt hotel chain (Botsman Rogers, 2010). Uber is currentlyvalued at $18.2 billion relative toHertz at $12.5 billionandAvis at $5.2 billion. Beyond item-by-item firms, there are now more than 1,000 cities across four continents where people can share cars. The global sharing economy market wasvalued at $26 billionin 2013 and some predict it will grow to become a $110 billion revenue market in the coming years, making it larger than the U.S.chain restaurant industry (PwC, 2014). The revenue flowing through the sharing economy directly into peoples wallets will surpass$3.5 billion this year, with growth exceeding 25%, according to Forbes. The business model where peers can offer and purchase goods and services from each other through an online broadcast continues to be applied to new industries from car sharing to peer-to-peer fashion, among many others (Cannon Summers, 2014).Discussion of ResultCollaborative consumption provides the platform to connect demand to the economise assets or space capacity. Growth of information and communication technology has ease access and research of all manners of information resulting development of numerous businesses through ground-breaking online applications. Such applications have found innovative ways to resonate the demands by maximizing utility through efficient allocation of resource.New Collaborative EconomyThe new model enables peers offer complimentary revenues for leaning their idle resources. This not only reduces the cost of the service or goods offered but acts as the substitutes of the market products. Hence the supply curve shifts rightwards and consumers are left(p) with more choice and better price.The current consumption trend produces broad amount of waste as the most of the current economy is based on take, make, dispose processes. In such context collaborative consumption is the opportunity that tracks the idle capacities and transforms the maximum wastes into value resources. Not only this phenomenon provides financial gains as well as long term economic gains without thrust people to buy new products it also provides affordable way to act for the environmental sustainability.Many traditional business and labor markets have questioned the implication of completely switching to the collaborative economy. In this scenario what business needs to study is that Collaborative Consumption is not a zero sum coarse-grained (Gansky, 2010). Rather than viewing this as a competition, it shows the need to adapt them into more efficient, inclusive and better system. In fact traditional big companies have already entered the game such as the rental company Avis entered the market by purchasing Zip-car, BMW has invested in Park-at-my-house and GM has partnered with Relay-Rides (Hamari, Sjklint, Ukkonen, 2013).Collaborative consumption is socially and economically sustainable because it fundamentally adapts to the needs of the consumer in order to be successful, instead of the other way around. In other words, the consumer is not have to sacrifice their individual lifestyle or personal freedom. Because fewer products are needed to satisfy the same amount of people, less waste is created. In this way, collaborative consumption is also environmentally-sustainable. These firms bring significant economic, environmental, and entrepreneurial benefits including an increase in employment and a reduction in carbon dioxide emissions (in the case of car sharing services).ConclusionThis research shows how a collaborative consumption facilitates eas ier access to capital goods without owning them and further free up resources and reduce befoulment from reduced usage. A limit of this study is the assessment of political and social implications of the collaborative consumption. This could be a logical following work to this research. by this study, we saw the environmental and economic prospects of collaborative consumption and opportunity it brings to consumers (peers) and businesses to be a part of global phenomenon towards efficiency and sustainability.Even though collaborative consumption is increasingly being valued in billions, it is still a nascent movement in the developing world. Awareness should be raised(a) as its the decisions that organizations make today which determines how for the collaborative consumption can live up to its potential.ReferenceBostsman, R., Rogers, R. (2011). Whats mine is yours How collaborative consumption is ever-changing the way we live. London Collins.Botsman, R., Rogers, R. (2010). Whats mine is yours The rise of collaborative consumption. New York harper Business.Buczynski, B. (2013). Sharing is good How to save money, time and resources through collaborative consumption. British Columbia New Society Publishers.Buytaert, D. (2014, September 6). The end of ownership The zero-marginal-cost economy. Retrieved 11 15, 2014, from The Next Web http//thenextweb.com/entrepreneur/2014/09/06/end-ownership-zero-marginal-cost-economy/Cannon, S., Summers, L. H. (2014, October 13). How Uber and the Sharing Economy Can march on Over Regulators. Retrieved from Havard Business Review https//hbr.org/2014/10/how-uber-and-the-sharing-economy-can-win-over-regulators/Cowen, T. (2013). Average is Over Powering the States Beyond the Age of the Great Stagnation. New York Dutton Adult.DARA and the mood Vulnerable Forum. (2012). Climate Vulnerability Monitor A Guide to the Cold Calculus of a Hot orbiter. Madrid Estudios Gricos Europeos.European Commission, Business Innovation Observatory . (2013). The sharing economy accessibility based business models for peer-to-peer markets. European Commission, Business Innovation Observatory. European Commission.Gansky, L. (2010). The mesh Why the future of business is sharing . New York Portfolio Penguin.Goucher. (2013). Zipcar Program. Retrieved 11 18, 2014, from Goucher College http//www.goucher.edu/about/environmental-sustainability/what-you-can-do/transportation-initiatives/zipcar-programHamari, J., Sjklint, M., Ukkonen, A. (2013, May 30). The Sharing Economy Why People take part in Collaborative Consumption. SSRN, 27.Owyang, J. (2013). The Collaborative Economy. San Mateo Altimeter Group.PwC. (2014). The Sharing Economy How will it disrupt your business ? PwC.Rifkin, J. (2014). The Zero Marginal Cost Society The Internet of Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse of Capitalism. New York Palgrave Macmillan Trade.Shaheen, S., Cohen, A. (2013). Innovative Mobility Carsharing Outlook Carsharing Market Overview, Analysis, and Trends. Berkeley Transportation Sustainability look Center, University of California, Berkeley.Suster, M. (2014). The Sharing Economy. Le Web (p. 46). London Le Web.The Economist. (2012, September 22). The future of driving. Retrieved 11 2, 2014, from The Economist http//www.economist.com/node/21563280/Worldwatch Institute. (2011). State of the World 2011 Innovations that Nourish the Planet today. Washington Worldwatch Institute.Page 1 of 19