'Culture Of Madness Midterm Essay\r'

'In the argument of the workweek as enjoin for the midterm assignment, I was able to understand scuttlebutts do to imply that something irrational had been say or had occurred. Of any those time at that place are two that were in my printing most interesting. They are as follows;- In the inaugural instance the stimulant that referred to irrationality was do was during a communion amid two girls. One was reporting the some some a nonher(prenominal) of something that a sponsor of theirs had said the preceding day. The two were chatting onward excitedly as unmatchable described to the other what had transpired. The watch ‘she can’t be sober’ was do by the listening hotshot.\r\nShe buzz offed this when the other friend told her that their friend (X), a girl non present in that location, had told her that she wanted to taste the services of a ribbon indorser. The talk then proceeded by girl H saying that that was her re action mecha nism similarly. Girl B wanted to know wherefore their friend wanted to yell the palm commentator. An definition followed where girl H said that their friend X had read in the lucre that palm readers could break what was expiration to run across in 1’s approaching. X wanted to know what was going to choke to her so that she could prepare for it and avoid disappointment.\r\nThe earnings had described numerous instances when citizenry were salve embarrassment and disaster when palm readers warned them well-nigh it. To this, both girl H and B laughed and concord that that idea was crazy adequate. They make fun on what their friend X would be told by the palm reader. They went on talking asking each other questions discussing their views on the same matter and whether they believed in much(prenominal) things. In the sec scenario there was a twain, probably a matrimonial one, where the lady told the worldly concern that she had quit her occupation.\r\nTo this the economise remarked ‘You’ve got to be kidding’. The intent of the wo firearm was quotidian at the start. In making the remark the hu earthity seemed to be in doubt as one who wanted the mastery by the char non to be true. The discourse proceeded with the lady reaffirming her statement and adding that she had pass in her resignation letter earlier. When asked why she had through that, the woman without mincing her course replied that she had had a ambitiousness severally, around 3 time in the previous week that the edifice in which she worked was going to better killing tribe with it.\r\nThe tear downt that the dream had come to her three times, she believed, meant that she was being warned of what would fall in prospective and so she had to place precaution. It would be wrong for her to ignore the signs however to regret later. Life was to a greater extent extraordinary than money and that is why she had do the decision. The flavour of the conversation turned sound when the man again remarked, ‘that is crazy’. He seemed truly annoyed and position the wife had make the wrong thing and proceeded to tell her so.\r\nThe tempers were flared as the woman was in pains to excuse why she had resigned and the man was either too angry or disappointed to construe her out. The man termed her beliefs as outrageous and sensual which do the woman all the same angrier. She finally walked out saying that it was meaningless to hire such(prenominal) a conversation with mortal who did non want to understand. In the starting study when the remark was do it made girl H who was narrating the sequent dismantle to a greater extent(prenominal) eager to continue with it. It gave her a adventure to explain in full point why their friend had made such a statement.\r\nThe response seemed to make the conversation more interesting and implied that the one listening to the flooring was elicit in more informati on. A reaction that was foreclosed or resisted was one whereby the friend narrating the story could refuse to patch with more information about the incident in discussion. The remark as well made sure that the conversation stayed on course as it uttered that the listener was quite interested in what went on , or why their friend being discussed had said that she wished her ca-ca were dead.\r\nThe response confirmed the intention of the narrator. Who also affirmed that she thought that their friend could not wear possibly been serious that she was going to visit a palm reader. The remark made the narrator know that her perceiving the story as one worth sacramental manduction was right. This reassurance made the girl dismantle more eager to tell what transpired and to even channel her views about the whole incident. In the second field the remark ‘you’ve got to be kidding’ made the woman seem even more serious in her assertion.\r\nIt made her pee-pee e verywhere her statement that she had quit her job. It also made her want to give an explanation for her commit before being misunderstood by the man. The remark, also made the situation take an even more serious tone as it actually implied that jokes would be incompatible at that time or the air at hand was not a joking matter. The reactions that were resisted were those of turning the matter into a laughing matter when it was serious. Also the chance to crowd out the incident as unimportant was closed out.\r\nThe remark showed that the man was actually serious about the subject at hand and consequently the woman could not easily divert the conversation or wish it away as trivial. afterwards the remark the conversation seemed to take a very serious tone. First the remark showed that the man was not at all in agreement with what the woman had done and would take a lot to dispose him that it was the right thing to do. In point further along the conversation some other remar k furnishing irrationality was made by the man. This made the woman more agitated as she wanted the man to see things from her point of view and she had not had a chance to make him do this.\r\nAs the conversation continued it seemed to intimately generate into a disagreement with the couple trying to keep their voices low in a public place. In the first scenario if the remark had not been made by girl B, the excitement of the story would deplete taken a dip. A dissimilar statement like ‘Oh yes I stir been smell for a palm reader myself’, would probably brace come as a shock to girl H who thought the idea of see a palm reader to be uneasy as well. The conversation would then grant turned to a discussion or even an argument for and against the normal of visiting palm readers.\r\nBecause girl H thought visiting a palm reader was ridiculous perchance the argument would fetch turned out to be serious making the two friends part ship canal or agree to disagree. The other look would throw off been for girl B to repartee in a way to show curiosity. For example ‘Oh really what does she want to find out? ’ or ‘oh yeah! , do those things work, can they really tell the future by computeing at one’s palm? ’ Because girl B would not cause shown support or disagree with what X wanted to do the girls would guard continued in a discussion to explore different views concerning such practices.\r\nThey would each give their different views on palm discipline. If the concept of visiting a palm reader would not crap been ridiculous to both girls, maybe they would have delved into discussions concerning the same with examples of what they had heard about the same. The conversation would have led to the issues about pass on in telling the future, the use of magic, black art and the like. The girls may have even agreed to join their friend when going to visit the palm reader. In this scenario the two girls were in agreement that seeing a palm reader was crazy.\r\nThough I did not have an opportunity to listen to them for long, I think that they would have described the practice as backward and funny. They would have push aside it as a practice utilise by the so called ‘future seers’ to drop away money from mickle who were naive enough to believe that such things were true. They would have termed those battalion who visit palm readers as irrational. several(prenominal) people who because they did not have anything they believed in, were looking for some thing to grasp.\r\nThey would also have dismissed the practice of palm reading material as that for those who were afraid of the future and therefore were looking for ways to manipulate it or even find hope and bravery if they found that the future had something good to look out for according to the palm reader. For the case involving the couple if the man had responded in a different way say maybe was more interested in the dreams that made the woman quite her job, the woman would have probably passionately described her convictions for what dreams tell about the future,.\r\nThe conversation would have deceased on and on how other people had dreams that made them avoid disasters. The man would have probably shared some dreams as well and their significance in his life. on that point would not have been an argument over quitting the job during hard economic times owing to ‘irrational beliefs’. The couple would have agreed that the action taken by the woman was the best for that situation and at rest(p) on to encourage themselves that they were going to set ashore another(prenominal) better job for the woman.\r\nSince they had taken it upon themselves to warn themselves of an impending danger then fate would have directed them to another equally good or even better job. The couple would have gone on to explore the gifting of some people who have the ability to tell what the future h old using dreams or even visions. They would also have discussed whether it was appropriate to tell some of her friends working at the building to follow her steps so as to be saved from injury or even death.\r\nThey may have even proposed ways of nurturing the gift like reading books or finding other people with the same gift as the woman then forming a support throng so to speak. In this case since the man found the idea of quitting a job because of a dream irrational, he may have dismissed it as superstitious when they met later. He would have wished the dream away as a result of what she had been cerebration during the day or a cinema she had watched. Her mind had just worked on what it had neat during the day and there was real discussion about the future from the dream.\r\nBelieving in dream would have been dismissed with the man saying that if everything that people dreamt had been a work out of the future then no disasters would have ever hurt anyone as they would be a verted in time and save people a lot of grief. The woman on the other hand would defend her case by giving examples of instances when something she had dreamt came true in real life. Apart from this she would argue that the fact that the dream was recurrent it was a fool sign that she needed to take action to avoid the impending danger.\r\nYes -not all dreams depict the future, but the one that had made her fire up up feeling anxious an version that there was more to it than she had imagined, she would defend herself: She would dismiss lack of treating the dreams she had as important as a sign that one did not believe in supernatural occurrences to that degree there were many that had been documented in books even in the present day. References Lessa, W. , and Vogt, E. (1958). ref in comparative religion- An anthropological approach. in the raw York. Row, Peterson and Company.\r\n'