Compare and contrast knowledge which can be expressed in words/symbols Essay

It is funny how the world-wide signs of intelligence be linguistic process and symbols or things that contain them. When soul walks past me with a load of books in their hand I immediately count oh what a smart and acquaintance open soulfulness, and Im sure Im not the only maven that births these pussy judgments. But from my point of view its understandable that manner of speaking and symbols ar the universal sign of association since we ar taught from books and macabreboards since our bambino years. Now what I consider friendship is things that we hold to be true and are able to identify in concrete life.Teachers absorb been molding our brains to be able to communicate our noesis using linguistic communication since we were little, save as we grow previous(a) and we get into secondary school we gravel to realize that at that place is cognition that croupenot be convey by dint of words and symbols. The mark of the foreign Baccalaureate program is to eve n up students well rounded and fellowshipable in much fields and along with that comes many requirements that separate programs do not go for a musical mode of their students. From my perspective knowledge that bathroomnot be deported in words and symbols is as of the essence(predicate) to break as knowledge that send packing, justifying the CAS requirements.CAS is the International Baccalaureate programs way of teaching us what cannot be cover in books or lectures. This knowledge can be described in words but only to a genuine extent. I think that CAS is a truly large contributing factor to why the IB program nurtures well rounded students. CAS pushes students to judge let on sunrise(prenominal) activities for the purposes of gaining run intos that would rent been other undiscovered. I believe that the key element to knowledge which cannot be packed in words and symbols is experience. For one of my CAS creative activities I knit scarves for my friends to wear to a scene premier.Through this activity I larn many things that would otherwise be inadequately explained in words. I wise to(p) sedulousness from powering through all of the arm cramps and headaches brought on by the sight of yarn. I learned ab discover my personal effort limits when I realized that making four scarves in a weeks succession was a greatly optimistic prognostication of my abilities. I got out from this experience a virtuoso of pride in what I made, a happening that is much more than complex than the pleasure taken in something done dictionary definition.All of these things append up to knowledge that could not fork out been expressed to me through words and symbols because they depended on my own experience. But CAS is not merely done by somatogenetic experience there is a received communicative component to it such as nurture to understand how to do something. In some other personal experience, not done for CAS, I tried to learn how to be adrift so before I took swimming lessons I read instruction manuals on swimming. When I finally got the chance to test out what I had learned from the manual in a pool I failed miserably.I knew the concept and the process but in some way there was a disconnect amidst reading and knowing the steps and their physical application. So from this you can see that oral/textual knowledge is important to guard but it is no supercedement for experience. In math words and symbols are basically all that are used, or or else all that can be used. In this area of knowledge there authentically isnt any populate for non-verbal knowledge. For example, in my math class I am given a hassle to work up the answer is always expected to be written subjugate to show the even off answer since there really is not room left to interpretation.It would be kinda the task to explain to my teacher how I used my emotions to lead me to the four build answer. This begs the question to what extent is verbal kn owledge more objective than knowledge that cannot be expressed in this way? mathematics is an area of knowledge that is for the most grapheme definite and pertaining to the cold hard facts, so any math done has to be based on established and globally accepted theorems and rules. Because of this, there is no room for personal feelings.When solving out problems you assimilate to be able to write it down so that others can understand what you have done to determine if you justified your answer. knowledge that can be exactly conveyed is requisite in order to make sense of the system of numbers and transfer new ideas whereas knowledge that cannot be expressed in words and symbols are more sexual congress to the knower and subject to emotional food color as everyone perceives experiences oppositely. With that utter math does take a certain degree of subjectivity as exemplified in Newtons anecdote to the formation of his laws of gravity.It takes a peculiar(prenominal) persons cre ative visual sensation and intuition to be able to make difficult problems then their insightful problem solving methods are adopted. When I was thinking about knowledge that cannot be express by words or symbols ethics came to mind. Ethics is always that area in our human nature that no one is exactly sure of. Rather than the black and white, right and vilify that we fetch in math, ethics shows us that there are many shades of gray that make it hard for us to explain why, for example, you can think stealing money is wrong but you are perfectly bonny with downloading music from torrents.It is apparently hardwired into our nature to find certain things wrong and others our duty, none of which we can fully explain into words or symbols. This kind of moral knowledge is more intuitive than an exact science alike(p) math which can be unafraid through proofs. For example, recently someone from the row below me came to me asking for clarification on an designation.Now, because I already had the class I understood the assignment and could have explained it to this person, but the problem came when I considered that I have enough things to worry about other than making sure someone understands an assignment that the rest of us had to figure out ourselves. Nevertheless, I explained the tedious assignment to the person because I felt that it was my duty to process the person. This sense of responsibility for helping others is doubtlessly engrained in all of us, or at least(prenominal) the sane, even when it defies reason and we know that we in all probability will not gain anything from the good deed.But going back to the very basis of this topic some whitethorn ask the question is there really any knowledge that cannot be communicated through language? Some believe that if you cannot pitch it into words or symbols then it was neer an idea or thought to come with. Their idea is that those moments where people cannot explain how they feel are not caused because the knowledge cannot be expressed in words or symbols but because the experiencer does not have the vocabulary or the eloquence to express it.From some other perspective it could also be said because language is a human concept that it is a problem of language where we have not created enough words to express certain thoughts and that after we label these certain thoughts it could then be expressed in words/symbols. Though there may be arguments about the existence of knowledge that cannot be expressed with words and symbols, I still believe that there is. I believe that there is a crack between book knowledge and knowledge gained from personal experience.Words simply cannot replace human experience, as exemplified by my failed attempts to swim after reading about it and existence told how. Words and symbols are essential to areas of knowledge such as math and the sciences where knowledge needs to be specifically conveyed so that there will not be any misunderstandings , but in other areas such as ethics words seem mostly inadequate and there is much more room for different interpretations.