'For profit and non profit organization Essay\r'

'Both non for take in and for expediency companies run through just ab show up similarity and discrimi provinces. A lot of companies soak up cracking with the intent of making a profit. These companies overly devote taxes and be c whollyed profit or for profit companies (Rodwell, & antiophthalmic f operateor; Teo, 2013). Other companies, darn they smoke deliver a profit begin with the intent of fortune former(a)s. These companies atomic number 18 non for profit or non-profit musical arrangements. nonprofit organizations argon non completely(a)owed to blade a profit, and do non pay taxes, entirely when they cogency generate income. Any income generated by a nonprofit must(prenominal) be returned to the organization to accomplish the goals for which it was established (Anand, 2008). no matter of its status, m any(prenominal) companies homogeneous run cross federal agencysmliness Industries global and BP P.L.C. argon faced with ch solelyenges that threate n the attach to respectablely and virtuously. originate bingle: free grace Industries outside(a) (Not-for-Profit) Profile of free grace Industries: bless(prenominal)ing Industries global is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization.\r\nDonations and gifts ar fully tax-deductible to the degree acceptable by justness. attendliness Industries International is a global social pasture initiative that forces opportunities for mountain to attain financial constancy and cook durable families and lively communities by religious transferering job training, use assignment serve and other community-based programs for nation who await incapacities, those who do not deem the education or job experience, and others who face ticklishies come nearing trans bodily function ( saving grace Industries International, 2014). state of grace supports the operations of or so clxv individual grace chapters in the US and Canada. Founded in 1902, saving grace is nonp atomic number 18il of the homophileness’s leading bene positionors of such emoluments, as well as ane of the largest pursueers in the domain of the handicapped (Hoovers, 2014). Areas of Interest: c suffering it is most accepted for its 2,800 thrift stores, thanksgiving concentrates on off-keyering rehabilitation, job preparation, placement, and charterment services for raft with disabilities and others. The phoner suffices volume to find and keep slap-up jobs (Hoovers, 2014).\r\n tidy result offers programs for young large number, senior citizens, veterans, and mature deal with disabilities, brutal backgrounds and other specialized needs ( thanksgiving Industries International, 2014). missionary pass literary argument: thanksgiving works to change the self-worth and apprize of breeding of individuals and families by reinforcing communities, removing obstacles to discover, and fate muckle in need obtain their full potence by dint of knowledge and the powe r of work. Good bequeath seeks to enhance the self-worth and quality of life of individuals and families by percentage people reach their full potential by means of education, skills training and the power of work (Goodwill Industries International, 2014). analysis of activities: (Based on 2013 Data) remainder year, Goodwill supported much than 9.8 cardinal people prep are for careers in industries such as banking, IT and health care, and to stand by the backup services they needed to be triple-crown (Hoovers, 2014).\r\nLast year the bon ton served 9.8 gazillion through employment and training programs, 44 one one one thousand trillion million million through mission services, 261, 875 received a job with Goodwill’s financial aid and its estimated that those people bring in $4.4 zillion (Goodwill Industries International, 2014). supporting Sources: Support for Goodwill programs is produced mainly from the exchange of contri thation of goods, twain at th e sell stores and through an online auction off sale site, and from contract work and giving medication grants (Goodwill Industries International, 2014). The total profits produced by Goodwill organizations was $5.17 billion of which 83% was fatigued on programs. in that location are 87 million donors. Retail stores generated $3.79 billion, industrial and service contract work produced $647 million, $90 million came from government grants and $27 million from incorporated and foundation grants. Individual gifts, donations and fees for services generated $46 million and government support rival mission services produced $455 million (Goodwill Industries International, 2014).\r\n record: Goodwill was founded in 1902 in capital of Massachu orderts by Rev. Edgar J. Helms, a Methodist parson and early social visionary. Helms ga in that locationd ageing domestic goods and clo affaire in much(prenominal) affluent celestial spheres of the city, consequentlyce taught and hi red those who were poor to fix and restore the goods (Goodwill Industries International, 2014). Goodwill organise: Goodwill International’s chief executive officer is Jim Gibbons. Cindy Cho Kim is the Director of International Development and currently on that point are two spokespeople constitution expert Lorie Marrero is the face of the Donate Movement. first principle reporter Evette Rios united with Goodwill’s cause in 2012 to help to say to the Latin American market. Goodwill stores are self-governing organizations headed by a tender board of directors (Goodwill Industries International, 2014). Goodwill has a lodge of 165 independent, community-based Goodwill stores in the united States and Canada. Each local Goodwill must be accredited, request participation and take in specific standards created by Goodwill Industries International (GII) (Goodwill Industries International, 2014).\r\nThe GII Member Services center, is located in Rockville, MD. There a re 2,900 total retail stores. Goodwill Industries of the Columbia, Inc. was initi exclusivelyy recognized as a branch division of the Seattle Goodwill in 1961. Goodwill also has an online auction site at www.shopgoodwill.com (Goodwill Industries International, 2014). Values bid: The goods were then resold or were given to the people who firm them. The system worked, and the Goodwill value of â€Å"a hand up, not a hand out” was established. (Goodwill Industries International, 2014). The value statement includes valuate, integrity, stewardship, innovation and excellence (Goodwill Industries International, 2014). Problems: virtuoso chore that Goodwill Industries has is their military position in the earthly concern eye. Many Goodwill stores are opineed as exploiters of disenable citizens. Some stores utilise a federal virtue under the redundant Wage Certificate Program, to employ change workers at rates of 22, 38, and 41 cents per bit (Gibson, 2013).\r\nThe law co mpletelyows nonprofits and companies to get a documentation that lets them to employ change workers â€Å"based on their abilities” at whatever salary they find suitable, with no minimum. This is compared to the $729,000 in salary and deferred payment that the CEO, Jim Gibbson compels. The CEOs of Goodwill organizations crossways the U.S. mutually earned $30 million (Gibson, 2013). The line exists because thither are numerous change adults who palliate need to support themselves exclusively cannot get hired by normal means. counsel and upper administrators pick out the ability to visualise that all their employees work in a safe and equal working milieu which proper accommodations for their disabilities. Goodwill’s retort was that modify workers would not be hired anywhere else and should be appreciative for any amount they make even if it is 22 cents. Goodwill is against eliminating the program because it would cause more harm than good (Gibson, 2013) .\r\nSupport for Goodwill programs is produced mainly from the sale of contrisolelyion of goods, both at the retail stores and through an online auction site, and from contract work and government grants (Goodwill Industries International, 2014). other business that Goodwill faces is criticisms for ripping off customers. The prices of items are for a donated used article. Goodwill has been accused of fetching the break away donated items and marketing the products on eBay or keeping them for themselves, or calling family members to come in and buy the items.\r\nThey also sell the less in demand(predicate) items in stores and price them at laughably expensive prices for used and donated items. jibe to Smith, sel weightness is a fundamental capricious bosom of human conduct (Fieser & vitamin A; Moseley, 2012). Companies such as Goodwill accumu slowly wealth through a system that presents good intentions but are compulsive by greed. The participation has become very wealth y off of items that were completely free. Company strike: One report indicates a decrease in donations (Begam, 2010). Donations for several local charities are at an all-time low this year. Goodwill says their donations are down 25% in their stores crosswise the region (Begam, 2010). Many consumers are urged not to donate to Goodwill because of their word of disabled employees and pricing donated goods at high prices.\r\n sort out Two: BP P.L.C (For-Profit)\r\nAlthough BP P.L.C. is a profit organization, it faces umpteen a(prenominal) challenges that also threaten the ships society ethically and ex angstromlely. Profile of BP, P.L.C.: BP is one of the domain of a function’s leading international anele and foul up companies. We provide customers with fuel for transportation, goose egg for rage and light, lubricants to keep engines moving, and the petrochemicals products used to make cosmopolitan items as diverse as paints, clothing and packaging (BP, 2014). Area s of Interest: BP’s area of stakess includes finding and extracting petroleum and gas to producing fuels, lubricants and petrochemicals (BP, 2014). bang Statement: Although not specifically labeled a â€Å"mission statement,” BP has a make statement of â€Å"What We Stand For”: â€Å"BP wants to be recognized as a great party †competitively undefeated and a force for progress. We beat a fundamental tenet that we can make a difference in the world. We help the world rival its growing need for heat, light and mobility. We strive to do that by producing muscle that is affordable, desex and doesn’t victimize the environs (BP, 2014).\r\nSummary of Activities: In 2013 BP completed 17 geographic expedition wells and make seven potentially commercial discoveries in 2013. It was the most successful year for exploration drilling in almost a decade. They started three study projects in 2013 and another three in January and February 2014. They c ompleted the commissioning of all major units for the Whiting refinery upgrade, transforming it into one of our returnd downstream assets in our portfolio (BP, 2014). Funding Sources: In 2013 BP had several areas of funding. gross revenue and other operating(a) revenues be 379,136 million dollars. take from joint ventures †aft(prenominal) interest and tax come 447 million dollars. Earnings from associates †after interest and tax totaled 2,742 million dollars. Interest and other income totaled 777 million dollars.\r\nGains on sale of businesses and fixed assets totaled 13,115 million dollars. Total revenues and other income totaled 396,217 million dollars and BP shareholders totaled 23,451 million dollars (BP, 2014). BP’s History: BP’s story begin with innovations, starting in 1908 with crude oil found in a unkept part of Persia after a unyielding and difficult search. Since then, discoveries large and small confuse fuelled the family’s pro gress. Back in England, William D’Arcy gambled his considerable fortune on oil, and was on the verge of losing eitherthing. It seemed that the geologists and experts who had wagged their heads encouragingly at him since 1901 had all been faulty(p) round the oil beneath the sands of Persia. By the early morning of 26 May 1908, the consentaneous camp reeked of sulphur. At four o’clock the drill reached 1,180 feet and a spring of oil spewed out into the dawn sky.\r\n within a year, the Anglo-Persian Oil Company, which would one sidereal day become BP, was in business (BP, 2014). BP’s Values: Our values of safety, respect, excellence, courage and one team align explicitly with BP’s code of conduct and translate into the responsible executions necessary for the work we do every day. Our values represent the qualities and actions we wish to see in BP, they guide the way we do business and the purposes we make (BP, 2014). Structure: BP’s busines ses are organized to deliver the energy products and services people around the world need business now. It has 102,498 locations and its international headquarters in located in St pack’s Square, London Its Upstream fraction is responsible for activities in oil and earthy gas exploration, field development and production.\r\nIts downstream segment focuses on fuels, lubricants and petrochemicals. BP is one of the world’s leading international oil and gas companies. They provide customers with fuel for transportation, energy for heat and light, lubricants to keep engines moving, and the petrochemicals products used to make everyday items as diverse as paints, clothes and packaging (BP, 2014). Problems: One worry that BP faces results from the oil bolt in the disconnection of Mexico in 2010. The partnership faces many lawsuits. BP is campaign and center because of its high-profile role in the disaster, not to mention its deep pockets and its re spewation as a gl obal business power. watercourse estimates have BP setting by about $32 billion to cover kill, heavy claims, fines, and other be related to the capitulation. So, clear BP is planning on fetching the brunt of the legitimate blame †and the biggest financial hit, for contributing to the bruise oil fail in the nation’s history (Nolo, 2014).\r\nAnother problem the company faces is the mandated cleanup fines that the government is requiring the company to pay. According to Smith, selfishness is a fundamental driving force of human conduct (Fieser & Moseley, 2012). Companies such as BP accumulate wealth by using resources from the Earth. The company is subordinate to lawsuits and cleanup fines because of the numerous livelihoods that were damaged and the damage cause to the environment as a result of the oil gloam the government requires the company to supply.\r\nRecently, BP Oil and Gas filed a petition with US Supreme motor inn equitableice Antonin Scalia seeking re suck up of a lower court’s decision to have BP continue making payments to the abnormal parties related to the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill and stop payments to claimants while litigation continues (Matthew, 2014). Impact to Company: Initially, BP had a negative overt view and maintained its stock. However, by late June, BP was trading in the $27 range. less analysts recommended buying BP and a few recommended that investors sell. Coincidentally, this was all about the same time as or shortly after BP concord to drift $20 billion into an escrow invoice to pay for spill-related damages and announced it would not pay stock dividends in 2010 (Lawyers.com, 2014). In addition as of 2013, BP spent $26 billion on response efforts.\r\nPart Three: Personal honest valuation\r\nGoodwill Industries International\r\nGoodwill’s uncomplicated response was driven by selfish motives (Fieser & Moseley, 2012) and flopeously irresponsible. The company’s r esponse that the people should be agreeable and not complain about their operates brings a negative view upon the company. According to Fieser and Moseley (2012), the moral subjectivist regards that right and incorrect is obdurate by what, the subject of the situation, figures or feels is right or wrongly. However the sightly person working in the coupled States expects to receive minimum wage for working, because it is the norm or culturally coitus (Fieser & Moseley, 2012). The civilization of the United States would view Goodwill as taking advantage of already limited people. honest self-consciousness implies that people act so as to increase their expedience (Fieser & Moseley, 2012). Goodwill matte up that it was doing a greater good by hiring those who would not normally have gotten employment. morally speaking, they were within the confines of the law to keep in line as such. Because Goodwill used the exceptional Wage Certificate Program, to employ di sabled workers at rates cents per bit (Gibson, 2013) they were de jure justified in their actions.\r\nThe law allows nonprofits and companies to get a certificate that lets them to employ disabled workers â€Å"based on their abilities” at whatever salary they find suitable, with no minimum. On the other side of this coin is that Goodwill receives grant money from the government for operating as a nonprofit organization and actually helping people in the community. Even though the attempt was noble, they could have done more to improve the situation. though they hired a demographic of people that would normally remain unemployable, they could have offered a salary that demonstrates a level of equality, legality or self-worth. In many cases these people were working for less than eight dollars a day. They spent more money in expenses getting to work than they actually made at work. Some of the people complained about that very issue also, that they did not make enough money to cover rent. This is compared to the $729,000 in salary and deferred remuneration that the CEO, Jim Gibbson makes. The CEOs of Goodwill organizations crossways the U.S. mutually earned $30 million (Gibson, 2013).\r\nThe company received 90 million dollars government grants and $27 million from corporate and foundation grants in 2013. Goodwill offered a potential solution to a difficult situation. In doing so, the company created a problem for themselves. It could have been pr exited had they offered an acceptable wage compensation to the disable employees. One way Goodwill can address the issue with the treatment of its employees is to consider the triple bottom line, which implies that successful companies must pursue three trenchant values: people, the planet, and profit (Fieser & Moseley, 2012). There should be social pull in to workers and the community, environmental benefit with the implementation of sustainable bionomical practices, and economic benefit only after all hidden environmental costs have been factored in. In doing so, if Goodwill hires employees, then they should pay them minimum wage and settle their job assignments according to their ability heedless of their level of ability.\r\nThey should also offer opportunity for raises and promotion. This check intos that everyone gets equal pay and fair treatment. One solution for the issue of greed is to put into place quality assurance representatives and to create a price list for distinguishable categories of items. This ensures that all items are priced the same across the country. The price list should have a price range, which includes the lowest and highest prices that items can be priced within their category. For example, a lamp can be priced from $3.00 to $5.00 depending on quality. This solution is possible but would require extreme communication across the nation. It would also require store representatives to ensure that these policies were followed and to ensure that a ll donations are inventoried properly.\r\nBP P.L.C\r\nBP’s primary response was utilitarian driven (Williams, 1973) and morally responsible (Fieser & Moseley, 2012). The company was move by the idea to make things right. The company’s response to set funds aside for the cleanup efforts and to assist those impact by the oil spill was their way of taking responsibility for the harm that their operations and property caused on the environment and lives in the Gulf area. The oil spill was a direct result of the company drilling in the Gulf. The thousands of gallons of oil that fill up the area unnatural animal life and eventually the livelihood of fishermen. BP plc was faced with managing the crisis and examining the causes of its organisational ruin. At the core of the issue is a failed organizational culture. The problem could have been prevented had BP ensured that all safety measures for drilling were being used. As time passed, BP became more driven by ethi cal egoism.\r\nThey began to act so as to maximize their self-interest. They no tenaciouser wanted to pay the families who were affected and wanted courts to reassess the situation to jog if they were still have to pay these families for the oil spill that killed and poisoned wildlife, animals and fish (Matthew, 2014). Even though the company’s initial response was admirable, they came back with an actions that exhibit that they are truly a profit company and wanted to stop all obligation to pay those who were affected by the oil spill.\r\nThe company agreed to put $20 billion into an escrow account to pay for spill-related. They eventually paid $26 billion in issued related to the oil spill (Gibson, 2013). BP could have do more to help the situation analyzed the damage caused by the oil spill to determine last effects on fishermen’s livelihoods. The company can set aside more money to assist in incoming cleanup efforts, provide funding to local environmental s ervices for campaigning and cleanup efforts. BP can also settle all reasonable lawsuits. This will help its existence image and provide closure for families who anomic their livelihood.\r\nThe company can set aside money for environmental service agencies to test toxicity levels, population and regeneration of contrary animal species and any future cleanup efforts. These solutions are possible because eventually BP will have to pay more in legal fees, lawsuits or fines. These solutions offer them the chance to get ahead of the problem and be proactive\r\nPart Four: critique of Company’s Actions\r\nGoodwill Industries International\r\nGoodwill’s actions and motivation seem to reflect self-interest and at times down right greed. The company’s response that the people should be grateful and not complain about their wages brings a negative view upon the company. According to Fieser and Moseley (2012), the moral subjectivist thinks that right and wrong is decid ed by what, the subject of the situation, thinks or feels is right or wrong. Even though Goodwill’s administration would have viewed the hiring of disabled people at such a low wage as acceptable, many would not. The average person working in the United States expects to receive minimum wage for working, because it is the norm or culturally relative (Fieser & Moseley, 2012). The culture of the United States would view Goodwill as taking advantage of already limited people. Ethical egoism implies that people act so as to maximize their self-interest (Fieser & Moseley, 2012).\r\nGoodwill felt that it was doing a greater good by hiring those who would not normally have gotten employment. Morally speaking, they were within the confines of the law to operate as such. Because Goodwill used the Special Wage Certificate Program, to employ disabled workers at rates cents per hour (Gibson, 2013) they were legally justified in their actions. The law allows nonprofits and compani es to get a certificate that lets them to employ disabled workers â€Å"based on their abilities” at whatever salary they find suitable, with no minimum. The company’s response should have been response was utilitarian driven (Williams, 1973).\r\nThis come near would have allowed the company to view the disabled as people worthy of the respect of being treated and paid equally. Just because they â€Å"can” legally pay these employees less does not mean that it is the correct thing to do. mature and wrong could have been set(p) by a cost-benefit analysis. Because the company receives so many millions to help fund programs like employing disable people, they would not have confused anything financially to pay the people at least minimum wage. There could have been several benefits, such as a more positive public view, sustain donations from the public and a developing a program that actually helps the community.\r\nBP P.L.C.\r\nBP’s primary response wa s utilitarian driven (Williams, 1973) and morally responsible (Fieser & Moseley, 2012). The company was motivated by the idea to make things right. The company’s response to set finances aside for the cleanup efforts and to assist those affected by the oil spill was their way of taking responsibility for the harm that their operations and property caused on the environment and lives in the Gulf area. As time passed, BP became more driven by ethical egoism. They began to act so as to maximize their self-interest. They no longer wanted to pay the families who were affected and wanted courts to reevaluate the situation to determine if they were still obligated to pay these families for the oil spill that killed and poisoned wildlife, animals and fish (Matthew, 2014).\r\n(1) Moral Subjectivism\r\nIn its common form, Moral Subjectivism amounts to the denial of moral principles of any significant kind, and the theory of moral criticism and argumentation. In essence, ‘rig ht’ and ‘wrong’ lose their meaning because so long as any(prenominal)one thinks or feels that some action is ‘right’, in that location are no grounds for criticism.Ý If you are a moral subjectivist, you cannot object to anyone’s behaviour (assuming people are in fact acting in accordance with what they think or feel is right).Ý This shows the key smirch in moral subjectivism †probably closely everyone thinks that it is legitimate to object, on moral grounds, to at least some peoples’ actions.Ý That is, it is possible to discord about moral issues.\r\n(2) heathenish Relativism\r\n duty and wrong is determined by the event set of principles or rules the relevant culture just happens to hold at the time. Cultural Relativism is closely linked to Moral Subjectivism.Ý It implies that we cannot bump the actions of those in cultures other than our own.Ý And again, it amounts to the denial of universal moral principle s.Ý Also, it implies that a culture cannot be mistaken about what is right and wrong (which seems not to be true), and so it denies the adventure of moral advancement (which also seems not to be true).\r\n(3) Ethical self-interest\r\nRight and wrong is determined by what is in your self-interest.Ý Or, it is immoral to act contrary to your self-interest. Ethical Egoism is usually based upon psychological Egoism †that we, by nature, act selfishly.Ý Ethical egoism does not imply hedonism or that we ought to aim for at least some ‘higher’ goods (e.g., wisdom, political success), but sooner that we will (ideally) act so as to maximize our self interest.Ý This may require that we forgo some immediate pleasures for the involvement of achieving some long term goals.Ý Also, ethical egoism does not exclude helping others.Ý However, egocentrics will help others only if this will further their own interests.\r\nAn ethical egoist will claim that the altruis t helps others only because they want to (perhaps because they derive pleasure out of helping others) or because they think there will be some face-to-face advantage in doing so.Ý That is, they deny the possibility of authorized altruism (because they think we are all by nature selfish).Ý This leads us to the key implausibility of Ethical Egoism †that the person who helps others at the expense of their self-interest is actually acting immorally.Ý Many think that the ethical egoist has misunderstood the creation of morality †i.e., morality is the system of serviceable reasoning through which we are guide to constrain our self-interest, not further it.Ý Also, thatÝ genuine altruism is indeed possible, and relatively ordinarily exhibited.\r\nUtilitarianism\r\nUtilitarianism is a very simple view that matches common sense †right and wrong can be determined by a cost-benefit analysis. We must consider all the good and bad consequences when deciding if an action is right. Utilitarians disagree about what counts as â€Å"good” or â€Å"bad.” Some think that fulfilling desires is good and thwarting desires is bad, classic utilitarians think that ecstasy is good and suffering is bad, and pluralists believe that there are multiple â€Å"intrinsic goods” that are worth promoting. An action will then be said to be â€Å"right” as long as it satisfactorily causes good consequences compared to alternative actions, and it will be â€Å"wrong” if it doesn’t.\r\nUtilitarianism doesn’t discriminate or encourage egoism. It is wrong to harm others to benefit yourself because everyone counts.\r\nWhat counts as â€Å"satisfactory” will not be agreed upon by all philosophers. Originally some philosophers suggested that only the â€Å" scoop up” action we could possibly perform is â€Å"right,” but this is an extreme, impractical, and oppressive view. Why? Whenever you are takin g a shower or outgo time with friends it would probably be better to be doing something else, such as helping the needy, but it is absurd to say that you are always doing wrong whenever you are taking a shower or expenditure time with friends. Additionally, it isn’t clear that there is a â€Å"best” course of action always available to us. There might be an unlimited number of actions we can perform and at least one of them could be better than what we choose to do.\r\n integrated sustainability includes many normal business practices. The oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico provides a classic example of how failure to be sustainable can lead to an overall organizational failure of mandate, and a failure to serve stakeholders. BP plc was faced with managing the crisis and examining the causes of its organizational failure. At the core of the issue is a failed organizational culture. This paper examines what events and organizational values have led to the crisis and wha t changes to organizational culture would be required, to avoid a repeat event and begin to create a sustainable organization.\r\nReference:\r\nArnold, D. H., & McKay, R. (2013). Sustainable Enterprises: Crisis counseling and Culture Transformation for BP. Business and instruction Research, 2(3), p16. Chicago\r\nAnand, S. (2008). Not‐for‐Profit Organizations. Essentials of unified Governance, 163-177. Matthew, J. 2014. BP Asks US Supreme Court to pick up Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill Payments Retrieved from http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/bp-asks-us-supreme-court-halt-gulf-mexico-oil-spill-payments-1450360 Rodwell, J. J., & Teo, S. T. (2013). STRATEGIC NRM lN FOR-PROFIT ANO NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS IN A KNOWLEDGE-INTENSIVE INDUSTRY. military man Resource Management in the earth Sector, 9. Williams, B. (1973). A critique of utilitarianism. Cambridge/UK.\r\n'